draft chen oauth agent revocation 00 OAuth 2.0 Agent Authorization Explicit Revocation
Revocation must be evaluated against the effects and state it actually reaches. A proposed cascade mechanism is not evidence that a running system removes persistent effects, or that its original delegation was legitimate.
Revocation must be evaluated against the effects and state it actually reaches. A proposed cascade mechanism is not evidence that a running system removes persistent effects, or that its original delegation was legitimate.
What the source establishes
An individual OAuth draft proposes agent level revocation beyond a single token. It describes batch revocation by agent identity, propagation through agent networks, conditional revocation and audit trails. The source identifies the document as work in progress.
Moona assessment and evidence limits
Revocation must be evaluated against the effects and state it actually reaches. A proposed cascade mechanism is not evidence that a running system removes persistent effects, or that its original delegation was legitimate.
Verification scope
Moona reviewed the retained source on 29 September 2026. Source acquisition and review establish provenance for this account; they do not reproduce an experiment, validate a vendor deployment or authorize an action.
Sources
This analysis interprets third-party reporting, research and announcements. Moona is not the original reporter of the underlying events.